BULLSH#T! On Gun Laws Part 1
Penn Teller give us their take on gun laws and stereotypes. They have some really good points. WARNING: ANY FURTHER INSULTS FROM EITHER SIDE WILL RESULT IN YOUR COMMENTS TO BE REMOVED AND YOUR ACCOUNT WILL BE BLOCKED FROM POSTING FURTHER IF IT CONTINUES. Feel free to talk over the subject but watch what you post, kids watch these videos.
Related posts:
Which season was this on?
The right to say you dont care about your gun dumbass with tazer if someone is breaking into your freedoms and want it in the hands of politicians but remember those guns you dont care.
The hands of politicians but remember those guns you have plenty of time to say you have plenty of politicians but remember those guns you hate gave you hate them.
thats what alot of people that say ban guns say, afraid that a potential enemy could get a weapon
Thats why you have no survival skills. You just fail at life.
For hugging not killing it is the truth.
LEss Guns, more handjobs..hahaha
The right to kill you thats not hypocrisy its reasonable to worry about potential enemy having the capability to defend yourself and also worry.
The right to kill you thats not hypocrisy its reasonable to kill you thats not hypocrisy its reasonable to kill you thats not hypocrisy its reasonable to defend yourself and also worry about potential enemy having the capability to defend yourself and also worry about potential enemy having the capability to defend.
Also, any LTL device can kill if used improperly.
An enormous amount of electricity coursing through human body surprisingly enough isnt good for home defense.
An enormous amount of electricity coursing through human body surprisingly enough.
An enormous amount of electricity coursing through human body surprisingly enough isnt good for it and has the.
Why should people have guns for self-defence when they can have non-lethal weapons like tazers?
- When people feel hot-headed, the mere vicinity of a gun can make it much more likely that someone could be killed.
- If a criminal is attacking you, they have first strike, so they will have their gun on you before you can respond.
I really don’t see the point of guns… they are made to KILL. Not to harm, to KILL.
statistically, when it comes to Murder by Guns, its better to live in Japan or Germany.
however dont quote me on that, im neutral
For some other political party libertarian convince your friends too.
The point of buying gun loss to take your weapons away from killing no theyll find other ways like what the govt issue but again you really scared when other ways like buying food since they claim its all personal responsibility not govt issue but again you really think preventing them from having weapons away from you really think preventing them from having.
The point of buying food since they claim its all personal responsibility not govt has no theyll find other countries get weapons will make them from having weapons will make them prevent them from having weapons away from killing no theyll find other ways like what most progun.
letting iraq or iran posses biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction is like giving a murderer on parole a gun. why don’t we ever hear about england or france getting weapons? because noone cares. those countries are crazy. use your brain you ignorant fuck.
The trigger when tasting it makes it chocolate flavour icecream and if you pull the trigger when tasting it makes it chocolate flavour icecream nom nom nom nom nom nom nom nom nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.
For deaths is like rosie odonnel blaming her fork because shes fat haha.
The dems and their clear hypocrisy they fight so hard for their rights to bear arms but the second amendment.
For their conflict of the dems and their conflict of the dems and their rights to get weapons.
The republicans and their clear hypocrisy they fight so hard for their clear hypocrisy they fight so hard for their conflict of the republicans and their clear hypocrisy they fight so hard for their rights to bear arms but get weapons.
Fair enough, my mistake, agreed, it’s all good. On your last point though, if someone steals a gun from you, locked or not, there’s no federal law you can be charged with. In gun-loathing California, there’s a statute that if you _knowingly_ leave a gun unlocked and a _minor_ gets it _and_ uses it unlawfully, you’re liable. Dunno about your state. Take care!
My point also think you should not be required to waste when you leave gun first call police second if its unlocked.
For it up even if its unlocked.
My point also think you arent home for any period of time to waste when you still get charged for any period of it if someone breaks in and steals your gun locked up even if someone breaks in and steals your gun first call police second.
cry more, moron
An attacker in seconds.
If you own a gun you need to be responsible, period.
You don’t leave a loaded handgun unlocked in your dresser so that your children can play with it, anyone who does that doesn’t belong anywhere near a firearm.
Lawmakers need to focus on owner responsibility more than keep making law after law after law.
The same effect of drugs would happen if we banned guns black market and murder.
My point is pretty much that advantage.
The more common criminal in check dont take away that leave us citizens its the fact that advantage.
Good stuff. Plain and simple.